量化历史研究的过去与未来

PDF(3101 KB)

清史研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4) : 1-16.

学术专论

量化历史研究的过去与未来

作者信息 +

On the Past and Future Prospects of Quantitative History Research

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

近六十年来量化历史研究拓展并加深了我们对历史的认知，使历史研究向科学靠近。不管哪个领域，科学研究的基本流程应该保持一致：首先，提出问题和假说；第二，根据提出的问题和假说去找数据，或者通过设计实验产生数据；第三，做统计分析、检验假说的真伪，包括选择合适的统计分析方法识别因果关系、做因果推断，避免把虚假的相关性看成因果关系；第四，根据分析检验的结果做出解释，如果是证伪了原假说，那原假说为什么错了？如果验证了当初的假说，又是为什么？这里挖掘清楚“ 因” 导致“果” 的实际传导机制甚为重要；第五步就是写报告文章。传统历史研究在第二至第四步上做的不够完整。所以，量化方法不是要取代传统历史研究，而是对后者的补充。本文通过一些现有成果说明，量化史学不只是“用数据说话”，而是通过统计分析，既可令人信服地证明或证伪现有假说，也可以从历史现象中发现全新的认知。

Abstract

For almost six decades quantitative history research has substantially deepened our understanding of history and made historical research more of a science. Regardless the field of inquiry，the basic scientific method follows five steps. First，identify the research question and develop a testable hypothesis；Second，find or generate data through experiments or from pre-existing sources relevant to the hypothesis; Third，conduct statistical analysis and hypothesis testing，including establishing or rejecting causal relations； Fourth，interpret the test results and uncover the channels through which the causality chain runs; Finally write a research report or paper summarizing the findings and analysis. This paper argues that there is considerable room for improvement in traditional historical research，in particular from the second to the fourth step outlined herein. That is historians should emphasize the use of both large samples and robust statistical methods，rather than just relying on case studies rather than replacing it; Historians should also make use of quantitative methods to establish causality and identify channels in which the causality runs. This paper shows that quantitative methods can not only make history research more robust and efficient but also discover new knowledge about history that would not be possible using traditional approaches.

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用

陈志武. 量化历史研究的过去与未来[J]. 清史研究. 2016, 0(4): 1-16

CHEN Zhiwu. On the Past and Future Prospects of Quantitative History Research[J]. Studies in Qing History. 2016, 0(4): 1-16

参考文献

Cipolla, Carlo. Literacy and Development in the West. Harmondsworth: Penguin Press, 1969.
North, Douglass C. and Robert Paul Thomas. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
Kennedy, Paul. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Vintage, 2010.
King, Gary, Robert Keohane and Sidney Verba. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Pomeranz, Kenneth. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
Elias, Norbert. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2000.
Brady, Henry and David Collier, eds. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004.
Goertz, Gary and James Mahoney. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
Mokyr, Joel. A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
North, Douglas. “ The New Economic History after Twenty Years. ” American Behavioral Scientists 21. 2 (1977) : 187 - 201.
Gurr, Ted Robert. “ Historical Trends in Violent Crime: A Critical Review of the Evidence. ” Crime and Justice 3 (1981): 295-353.
O’ Brien, Patrick. “ European Economic Development: The Contribution of the Periphery. ” Economic History Review, Second Series 35. 1 (1982) : 1 - 18.
De Vries, Jan. “ The Industrial Revolution and the Industrious Revolution. ” Journal of Economic History 54. 2 (1994): 249-270.
Eisner, Manuel. “ Long-Term Historical Trends in Violent Crime. ” Crime and Justice 30 (2003) : 83 -142.
Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson and James Robinson. “ The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change and Economic Growth. ” American Economic Review 95. 3 (2005) : 546 - 579.
Becker, Sascha O. and Ludger Woessmann. “ Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History. ” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124. 2 (2009) : 531 -596.
Eisner, Manuel. “ Killing Kings Patterns of Regicide in Europe, AD 600 – 1800. ” British Journal of Criminology 51. 3 (2011) : 556 -577.
Woodberry, Robert D. “ The Missionary Roots of Liberal Democracy. ” American Political Science Review 106. 2 (2012): 244-274.
Van Zanden, Jan Luiten, Eltjo Buringh and Maarten Bosker. “ The Rise and Decline of European Parliaments, 1188 –1789.” EconomicHistoryReview65. 3 (2012): 835-861.
Blaydes, Lisa and Eric Chaney. “ The Feudal Revolution andEurope's Rise: Political Divergence of the Christian West and the Muslim World before 1500 CE. ” American Political Science Review 107. 1 (2013) : 16 - 34.
Kung, James Kai - sing and Chicheng Ma, “ Can Cultural Norms Reduce Conflicts? Confucianism and Peasant Rebellions in Qing China. ” Journal of Development Economics 111 (2014) : 132 - 149.
Bai, Ying and James Kai - sing Kung. “ Diffusing Knowledge while Spreading God’ s Message: Protestantism and Economic Prosperity in China, 1840 – 1920. ” Journal of European Economic Association 13. 4 (2015) : 669 - 698.
Wu, Qinglong, Zhijun Zhao, Li Liu, Darryl E. Granger, Hui Wang, David J. Cohen, and Xiaohong Maet al. “ Outburst Flood at 1920 BCE Supports Historicity of China’ s Great Flood and the Xia dynasty. ” Science, 353. 6299 (2016): 579-582.?
Chen, Zhiwu, Peng Kaixiang and Zhu Lijun. “ Homicide Rate History of QingChina. ” Yale University Working Paper, 2016.?
Sun, Shengmin. “ Fifty Years of Cliometrics: Conflict，Convergence and Development of Economic and Historical Paradigms. ” Social Sciences in China 4 (2009) : 142 -161.?
Chen, Zhiwu, Lin Zhan and Peng Kaixiang. “ Violent Conflicts in Private Lending: A Research Based on Qing Dynasty’s Homicide Reports. ” Economic Research Journal 49. 9 (2014) : 162 -175.?
Liang, Chen, Dong Hao and Li Zhongqing. “ Quantitative Database and Historical Research. ” Historical Research 2 (2015): 113-128.?
Li, Bozhong. “ Historical Records and Quantization: A Discussion about Quantitative Methods in Historical Research. ” Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 30. 4 (2015) : 51 -63.?
Peng, Kaixiang. “ China’ s Long - run Economic Transition in Historical Perspective: A Survey of Recent Cliometric Studies about China’s Economic History. ” Economic Research Journal 50. 5 (2015) : 178 -191.?
Lin, Zhan and Chen Zhiwu. “ Class Status，Interlinkage，Seasonality in Private Lending. ” Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 30. 5 (2015) : 177 - 187.?
Chen Zhiwu and Lin Zhan, “ Institutional Development in China and the West: A Comparative Study Based on Regicide and Ruler Duration”, Yale University Working Paper, 2016.?