在观念层面上，“崇德改制”与随后发生的“丙子之役” 这两个事件之间具有特殊的意义及关联性。在朝鲜看来，“崇德改制”关涉整个天下秩序的变更，表达了金－ 清政权取代大明、成为新的天下共主的诉求。对于金－ 清政权而言， 其诉求的正当性根据在于天下“惟有德者居之”，而现实基础则是蒙古与朝鲜的臣服。相较蒙古，“小中华” 朝鲜的归顺尤具特殊意义，它既能增强皇太极有德之君的形象，又能消解明朝支配天下的正当性基础。因此，征朝就成为清政权改号称帝后的当务之急。通过“丙子之役”，清朝的军事征服将朝鲜纳入其政治框架，但并没有完全取得预期效果，朝鲜仍然不承认清朝的正统性。
Abstract
Conceptually， there was a special significance to the connection between the “Chongde Ｒeformation”in 1636 and the subsequent battle between the Qing Dynasty and Joseon Korea，known as “the second Manchu invasion of Korea． ”From the view point of Joseon Korea， the “Chongde Ｒeformation”reflected the Qing’s desire to replace the Ming Dynasty and involved the transformation of the world order． The legitimacy of the Qing’s claim was based on the idea that only a ruler with the highest moral standing had the qualification to be the world’s ruler． To prove this claim it was necessary to conquer Mongolia and Joseon Korea． In contrast with Mongolia，Joseon Korea’s submission to the Qing had special significance，which reinforced Hong Taiji’s moral image and deconstructed the legitimacy of Ming as the world ruler． Therefore，after the“Chongde Ｒeformation”，the primary task of the Qing became putting Joseon Korea in subjugation． Through the second Manchu invasion of Korea，Joseon Korea was incorporated into the political framework of the Qing Dynasty，but still did not admit the Qing’s legitimacy，which suggested that the Qing’s conquest did not completely achieve the expected result．
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
Cai Meibiao. “Daqingguo jianhao qian de guohao, zuming yu jinian”(The State Name, Ethnic Name and Chronology before the Establishment of Qing Dynasty). Lishi yanjiu (Historical Research), 3 (1987).
Chao Zhongchen. “You’xiongdi zhi guo’dao’junchen zhi yi’: Qing ruguan qian yu chaoxian guanxi de yanbian”(On Evolution of the Qing-Korea Ｒelations before 1644). In Zhu Chengru, Wang Tianyou eds. Mingqing luncong ( A Collection of Essays on the Ming and Qing Dynasties), Vol.12. Beijing: Gugong chubanshe, 2012．
Diao Shuren. “Lun qingchao yu chaoxian zongfan guanxi de xingcheng yu queli”(The Formation and Establishment of Suzerainty-Feudatory Relationship between the Qing Dynasty and Korea). Yangzhou daxue xuebao (Journal of Yangzhou University［Humanities and Social Sciences Edition］).1 (2003) ．
Ichimura, Sanjiro. “On the Name of the Qing Dynasty.” Toyokyokai Chosabu Gakujutuhoukoku. July 1909．Shi Shaoying. Heyue beihou de zhiheng: dui’dingmao zhi yi’ji jinxian tanpan de zai tantao”( The Conditionality behind Peace Treaty: Restudy on the Battle of Dingmao and the Negotiation between Houjin and Chosǒn Dynasty Concerning the Battle). Lishi jiaoxue ( History Teaching), 7 (2012).
Song Huijuan. ”1627－1636 nianjian houjin (qing) yu chaoxian guanxi yanbian xintan”(The Evolution of the Relationship between the Later Jin Dynasty ( Qing) and Korea during the Period from 1627 to 1636). Dongjiang xuekan (Dongjiang Journal),2 (2003)．
Watanabe, Shinichiro. Zhongguo gudai de wangquan yu tianxia zhixu: Cong zhongri bijiao shi de shijiao chufa ( Royal Authority and World Order in Ancient China: A Comparative Historical Studies of Japan and China), Translated by Xu Chong. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2008．
Xu Kai. “Lun’dingmao luluan’yu’bingzi huluan’: Jian ping huangtaiji liangci yongbing chaoxian de zhanlue”(Discussion on Jeongmyo-Horan and Byeongja-Horan: Analysis on the Strategy about Twice Invasions of Joseon Korea by Hong Taiji). Dangdai hanguo (Contemporary Korea) , 3 (1994) ．
Ye Hong, Hu Axiang. “Daqing guohao shulun”(Commentary about the Dynastic Title of Qing) . Zhongguo lishi dili luncong (Journal of Chinese Historical Geography).4 (2000) ．
Zhang Cunwu. Qingdai zhonghan guanxi lunwen ji (Collected Papers on Sino-Korean Relations in Qing Dynasty). Taipei: Shangwu yinshuguan, 1987．
PDF(1577 KB)
