甲午黄海之役北洋海军缺乏炮弹说质疑——兼论其失利原因问题

潘向明

清史研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1) : 83-93.

PDF(412 KB)
PDF(412 KB)
清史研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1) : 83-93.
学术专论

甲午黄海之役北洋海军缺乏炮弹说质疑——兼论其失利原因问题

作者信息 +

Questioning the Argument of North Sea Navy’s Ammunition Lacking in the Battle of the Yellow Sea in 1894 with Another Thought on the Reasons of the Qing’s Defeat

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

关于甲午黄海海战北洋海军失利原因的解释,传统观点有所谓缺乏炮弹之说,在社会和学术界都有很大影响。此说主要出自当时几个来华西人,即泰莱、赫德、汉纳根等人的相关说法。但笔者认为,此说大可怀疑,难以成立,是对失利原因的一种错误解释。

Abstract

The North Sea Navyps Ammunition Lacking has been taken as the major reason for the Qingps defeat in the battle of the Yellow Sea. But this argument mainly derived from the account of a few Westerners in China , among whom are William F. Tyler , Sir Robert Hart and C. von Hannecken , etc. This essay questions the validty of the argument and provides a more balanced explanation.

引用本文

导出引用
潘向明. 甲午黄海之役北洋海军缺乏炮弹说质疑——兼论其失利原因问题[J]. 清史研究. 2009, 0(1): 83-93
PAN Xiang-Ming. Questioning the Argument of North Sea Navy’s Ammunition Lacking in the Battle of the Yellow Sea in 1894 with Another Thought on the Reasons of the Qing’s Defeat[J]. Studies in Qing History. 2009, 0(1): 83-93

PDF(412 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉