主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 126-139.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

从“武昌假光绪案”看己亥建储前后的舆论和政局

  

  • 出版日期:2019-08-15 发布日期:2019-08-15
  • 作者简介:王刚(1979 -),男,西南大学历史文化学院中国抗战大后方中心讲师,重庆 400715;donghonggang7@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文为国家社科基金“近代日本对长江上游地区调查活动研究”(18BZS106)前期成果。同时得到“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(抗战大后方经济发展与社会变迁,SWU1709122)”资助。

The Conflict between the Mass Media and Qing Government Reflected by The Case of Fake Emperor in Wuchang

  • Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-08-15

摘要: 刘成禺笔下的“武昌假光绪案”流传甚广,情节却未必近真。本文首先是考订该案史实,进而管窥己亥、庚子之交的政局演变。认为该案属于撞骗之案,“假光绪”并无任何政治企图。之所以由“常案”升级为“奇案”“巨案”,主要由“建储”前后的政局大气候所致。最重要者是“建储”后,《汉报》等新党报刊为维持“反废立”的舆论热潮,有心煽惑;旧党为压制舆论而野蛮报复。政局在“新党肆于言”“旧党肆于权”的交替上升中一步步恶化。

Abstract: “The Fake Emperor Guangxu in Wuchang” was a well-known composition by Liu Chengyu. Although the plot sounds interesting, the story was not likely accurate. This article reveals the specific chain of events surrounding this work and discusses the political situation on the eve of Boxer Movement. It concludes that The Fake Emperor was a fraud and had no political intent. The political chaos of the time mainly resulted from the serious conflicts in the attempted establishment of a Crown Prince in 1899. Perhaps most remarkable, the mass media, which mostly edited by reformers, was strongly against Qing Government’s plan of announcing a Crown Prince. So, the media energetically took the fake Emperor rumors to provoke people’s emotions, and there is no doubt regarding the Government’s vengeful repression. This trend partly resulted in the Government’s antiforeignism as well as the worsening of the overall political situation.