制度定型与思想张力：嘉道时期对“壅蔽”问题的讨论

清史研究

制度定型与思想张力：嘉道时期对“壅蔽”问题的讨论

孙明

北京大学中国政治学研究中心

出版日期:2020-05-15 发布日期:2020-05-15
作者简介:孙明，男，北京大学中国政治学研究中心助理教授。
基金资助:
本文受到北京大学公共治理研究所专项课题项目资助。

Institutional Establishment and Ideological Tension: A Discussion of “Obstruction” in the Jiaqing and Daoguang Reigns

SUN Ming

Research Center for Chinese Politics，Peking University

Online:2020-05-15 Published:2020-05-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从制度的发展过程而非静态的视角来看，嘉道时期是清代言路制度的定型时期。文书从题本到奏折，中枢从内阁到军机处的重大转变，决定了言路在政治体制中的边缘化地位。士林由此切入批评“壅蔽”问题和言路制度，坚持言路在政治体制中的结构性功能，君主则将言路问题归罪于士大夫的私心私利。制度与制度思想共成一体，从清代言路的制度思想来看，“前代法意”与“本朝法意”之间又存在张力，相反相成，形塑了清朝的言路制度体系。

Abstract:

From the perspective of institutional development process rather than static, the Jiaqing and Daoguang reigns was the period when the system of communication channels was finalized. The great changes of the information system from the title book to the memorial, and the center from the cabinet to the Grand Council determined the marginal position of the communication channels in the political system. From this point of view, the intelligentsia criticized the problem of “obstruction” and the system of communication channels, insisting on the structural function of communication channels in the political system, while the emperor blamed the problem on the private interests of the bureaucrats. The system and its ideology were integrated together. From the perspective of the ideology, there was tension and contradiction between the “former generation’s legal meaning” and “this dynasty’s legal meaning”, forming the characteristics of the communication channels.

孙明. 制度定型与思想张力：嘉道时期对“壅蔽”问题的讨论[J]. 清史研究.

SUN Ming. Institutional Establishment and Ideological Tension: A Discussion of “Obstruction” in the Jiaqing and Daoguang Reigns[J]. Studies in Qing History.

参考文献

Beatrice Bartlett. Junzhu yu dachen: qing zhongqi de junjichu(1723—1820)(Monarchs and Ministers: the Grand Council in Mid-Ch’ing China, 1723-1820). Translated by Dong Jianzhong. Beijing: Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe, 2017.

Benjamin A. Elman. Jingxue zhengzhi he zongzu—zhonghua diguo wanqi Changzhou jinwenxuepai yanjiu(Classicism, Politics, and Kinship: The Ch’ang-chou School of New Text Confucianism in Late Imperial China). Translated by Zhao Gang. Nanjing: Jiangsu renmin chubanshe, 1998.

Gu Hongting. “Qingdai zhi duchayuan”(The Department of Supervision in Qing Dynasty) in Qingdai guanzhi yanjiu(On the Official System of Qing Dynasty). Taibei: Wunan tushu chuban gongsi, 2005.

Guan Wenfa. Jiaqing di( Jiaqing Emperor). Changchun: Jilin wenshi chubanshe, 1993.

Guan Wenfa. “shiping jiaqing de ‘guangkai yanlu’ yu ‘HongLiangji shangshu shijian’”(Comments on Jiaqing’s “Broad Talk” and “the Event of Hong Liangji’s Presention”). Huanan shifan daxue xuebao(Journal of South China Normal University)(1) 1996.

Philip Alden Kuhn. Jiaohun: 1768nian zhongguo yaoshu dakonghuang(Soulstealers: The Chinese Sorcery Scare of 1768). Translated by Chen Jian and Liu Chang. Beijing: Sanlian shudian and Shanghai: Sanlian shudian, 2012.

Tang Jihe. “Qingdai kedaoguan zhi renyong”(The Appointment of Supervisory Officers in Qing Dynasty). Zhongyangdaxue shehuikexue congkan(Social Sciences Series of Central University)(2) 1934.

Tang Jihe. “Qingdai kedaoguan zhi gongwuguanxi”(The Official Relations of Supervisory Officers in Qing Dynasty).Xin shehuikexue(New Social Sciences)(2) 1934.

Tang Jihe. “Qingdai kedao zhi chengji”(The Achievements of Supervisory Officers in Qing Dynasty). Zhongshan wenhua jiaoyuguan jikan(Quarterly of Zhongshan Museum of Culture and Education)(2) 1935.

Tang Jihe. “Qingdai kedao zhi zhizhang”(The Duties of Supervisory Officers in Qing Dynasty). Dongfang zazhi(Oriental Magazine)(1) 1936.

Tang Jihe. “Qingdai kedaoguan zhi teshu baozhang yu jinji”(The Special Guarantee andTaboo of Supervisory Officers in Qing Dynasty). Xue si(Learning and Thinking)(1) 1944.

William T. Rowe. Yanli: Bao Shichen yu 19shiji de gaige( Speaking of Profit: Bao Shichen and Reform in Nineteenth-Century). Translated by Xu Cunjian. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2019.

Yang Guoqiang. “Wanqing de qingliu yu mingshi”(Qing Liu and Its Personages in Late Qing Dynasty) in Wanqing de shiren yu shixiang(Scholars and the World in the Late Qing Dynasty). Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 2017.

Zhang Ruilong. Tianlijiao shjian yu qing zhongye de zhengzhi xueshu yu shehui(The Tianli Sect Incident and the Politics, Academy and Society in the Mid-Qing). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2014.

Zhang Yufen. “Lun jiaqing chunian de ‘xian yu weixin’”(On the “All Take Part in Reform” in the Early Years of Jiaqing). Qingshi yanjiu(Studies in Qing History)(4) 1992.

Institutional Establishment and Ideological Tension: A Discussion of “Obstruction” in the Jiaqing and Daoguang Reigns