主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

清史研究

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

从例的修订看清代治理模式:以《大清律例》《会典事例》为主的分析

彭凯翔 林展   

  1. 河南大学经济学院;中国人民大学清史研究所
  • 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2020-11-15
  • 作者简介:彭凯翔( 1978 -),男,河南大学经济学院教授,开封 475001, kaixiangp@qq.com;林展( 1984 -),男,中国人民大学清史研究所讲师,北京 100872, zhan.lin@ruc.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    林展感谢国家社会科学基金青年项目“清代债务命案研究”(项目号: 19CZS032)的支持。

Amending the Central Regulations (Li) and the governance of the Qing Dynasty: An Analysis Based on Great Qing Code (Da Qing lü li) and The Collected Statutes and Precedents (Huidian Shili)

PENG Kaixiang and LIN Zhan   

  1. School of Economics, Henan University; kaixiangp@qq.com;Institute of Qing History, Renmin University of China; zhan.lin@ruc.edu.cn
  • Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-11-15

摘要:

对于清代例的修订,它在数量上的不断增长引人瞩目,学界从不同的角度对此予以了解释。本文发现,清代例的增长并不持续,各类例之间亦存在差异。律例的增长主要是在乾隆中期以前实现的,在这之后即出现了中落,而部院则例的增速下降相对更弱,且不如律例持续。随着数量的变化,例的结构亦有变化,“因案生例”相比“因言生例”的重要性上升,《大清律例》呈现出“刑律化”的倾向。同时,中央部门的例始终以“治吏”为主体,但通过“治吏”也规范了地方的官民关系,使得民间的规范有一定的空间上升为地方层面的法规范,从而实现更加有弹性的治理。

Abstract: The?continuous?growth?of?regulations?(li)?in?the?Qing?Dynasty?has?been?documented?and?explained?by?voluminous?literature.?However,?this?paper?finds?that?this?literature?does?not?capture?the full?picture.?The?upward?trend?in?the?number?of?new?regulations?(li) in the Great Qing Code (Da Qing Lü Li)?was?not?sustained?throughout?the?entire?Qing?Dynasty.?Additionally,?the?patterns?in?the?growth?of?new?regulations?(li)?were?of?different?for?various?types?of?regulations.?The?growth?of?regulations?(Li) mainly?occurred?before?the?middle?period?of?the?Qianlong?reign,?but?afterwards?there?was?a?decline.?However,?the?decline?in?the?growth?rate?of?new?regulations?and precedents?(zeli) of the central government departments?of?the?bureaucracy?was?relatively?weaker?and?not?as?sustained?as?regulations?(li) in the Great Qing Code.?With?the?change?in?the?number,?the?structure?of?the?regulations?(li) has also changed. The?importance?of?“enacting?regulations?based?on?cases”?increased?compared?with?“enacting?regulations?based?on?high?rank?officers’?suggestions.”?The?tendency?toward?“criminalization”?in?the?Great Qing Code?was?also?strengthened.?In?the?meantime,?“governing officials”?remained?the?main?source?of?central?regulations for the Great Qing Code.?Governing?officials?also?shaped?the?relationship?between?local?government and society, and this provided room for private regulations to gain legal validity indirectly.This?source?of?legislation?increased?the?adaptability?of?the?governance?of?the?Qing?Dynasty.