主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

清史研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 90-104.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

康熙四十六年修律进呈本的发现及初步研究

姚宇(1991 -),男,中国社会科学院法学研究所博士后,北京 100720;yaobuyu@126. com   

  1. 中国社会科学院法学研究所
  • 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-05-25
  • 作者简介:姚宇
  • 基金资助:
    本文为北京市社会科学基金 目“ 清代法制之腹边文化互动研究 ”( 项目编号:20FXA004)的阶段性成果。

The Discovery and Preliminary Study of the Draft Code Submitted in 1707

YAO Yu (Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; yaobuyu@126. com)   

  1. Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
  • Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-05-25
  • About author:YAO Yu

摘要: 国家图书馆所藏一部《大清律集解附例》抄本可确认为康熙四十六年修律进呈本。该本的发现为研究清代康熙、雍正两朝修律活动提供了新的材料。梳理进呈本条文并与顺治律对比,可知康熙修律深入、系统,为雍正律的制定奠定了坚实基础。将之与雍正律对比,可发现除新增条例外,雍正律对进呈本原定内容亦有不少修改和发展。进呈本与雍正律一脉相承而各有特色,二者共同反映了清律从承袭明律到因时制宜的演变历程。

关键词: 大清律集解附例, 康熙修律, 进呈本, 雍正律

Abstract: It is identified that a manuscript of the Great Qing Code (Da Qing Lü Ji Jie Fu Li) collected by National Library of China could be the draft code submitted in 1707, the 46th year of Kangxi reign. The discovery of this manuscript provides new historical materials for further research on legislative activities in the reigns of Kangxi and Yongzheng. The comparison of the draft code and the Shunzhi Code indicates that the revision of law in the Kangxi reign was systematized and fruitful, and it laid a solid foundation for the Yongzheng Code. Contrasting the draft code with the Yongzheng code has found that the latter not only inherited but also amended and developed the former. The draft code and the Yongzheng Code were in the same lineage while they had different characteristics, collectively both codes reflected the evolution of the Qing’s Code from inheriting the Ming’s Code to adjusting to circumstances.