Abstract: Based on the Yan Ruoju's Inquiry into the Authenticity of the Ancient Text of the Shangshu and other scholars' identification of a counterfeit Book of History，this paper draws on the related bamboo slips of the Chu Kingdom in the Warring States and further explains the historical inconsistencies in the“Grand Preface”of the Book of History such as the claim that there were 25 chapters in the Old Text of the Book of History and that Kong Anguo contributed to the book． The chapters of Jincheng， Juli，and Nanshan mentioned in Kong Anguo's“remark”were written by others after Kong Anguo，and the chapters such as Junchen，Junyan，Dayumo were bogus． This paper rebuts the“Critique”of the Commentary by Yan Ruoju and the defense of the Mei Zhe's contribution of Old Text of the Book of History in the book “Judgment in the Case of Old Text of the Book of History”by Zhang Yan．

摘要： 本文在阎若璩《尚书古文疏证》和其他学人辨《尚书》古文之伪的基础上,结合近年出土的战国楚简等相关资料,申论"尚书大序"中古文《尚书》二十五篇说、孔安国献书作传说与史实不符,孔安国《传》中的"金城"、"驹丽"、"南山"是晚于孔安国的人所写,古文经中的《君陈》、《君牙》、《大禹谟》等乃伪作,从而反驳张岩先生在《审核古文〈尚书〉案》一书中对阎氏《疏证》的"甄别"(即批判)及其为梅赜所献古文《尚书》的辩护。