Abstract:  In the process of local litigation in the Qing dynasty, the law stipulated that the complaint delivered by the plaintiff must be reviewed and recorded by an official scribe. At present, the academic discussion regarding the specific process involving the official scribe affixing a seal and the actual identity of the plaintiff needs further clarification. In this essay, the author examines the example of Jing Tianlei" of Songyang, a case which was collected by Zhejiang Normal University, along with the litigation files from other areas of southern Zhejiang. Based on changes in the serial numbers of the official scribes and the identity of the plaintiffs,  the author puts forward the concept of “creation right”and “transcription right” of the document while also estimating the scale of regional litigation. The author finds that the seal was the most important symbol of the official scribe in the Qing dynasty.

Key words:  , Qing Dynasty, official scribes, seals, plaintiffs

摘要：      在清代地方诉讼过程中， 清律规定状民所投递的状词，需由专门的官代书审核并写录，但关于清朝官代书盖戳的具体运作流程以及诉状制作者的实际身份仍有待进一步厘清。本文以浙江师范大学典藏的松阳《惊天雷》案宗为例，结合浙南其他地区所藏的诉讼档案，从编号代书戳印以及诉状制作者的身份演变入手，在对地区诉讼规模预估的同时，提出状文“创作权”“誊录权”的概念，指出盖戳是清朝官代书存在的主要标志。