有关惠栋托名王应麟著书一事，曾引起清中叶以来的许多学者关注。除《左传贾服注》与《论语郑注》外，清代学者还指认惠栋托名撰集另一部著作——《尚书郑注》。前两部著作由惠栋撰集，为今日学界所认可，但由于后一部著作鲜有人知，遂使其托名问题成为疑案。本文以清代文献中有关惠栋 “托名”的说法为基础，据段玉裁所见的惠栋辑本《尚书郑注》和惠栋《九经古义》中的相关案语，论证出上海图书馆、国家图书馆藏旧题王应麟所撰的清钞本《古文尚书》即惠栋托名之作《尚书郑注》。经校对分析后，可以确定上图、国图藏本《古文尚书》属于同一版本系统。这一系统存在多种钞本，李调元刊刻《郑氏古文尚书》所据的“原本”即为其中之一。惠辑本《尚书郑注》曾在清代学术界广为流传，李调元对该著的订补与刊刻之功不可磨灭。

Since the mid-Qing dynasty, many scholars have realized that Hui Dong might have compiled three commentaries on the Confucian Canons, namely Zuozhuan Jia Fu zhu, Lunyu Zheng zhu and Shangshu Zheng zhu, for the purpose of intentionally attributing these works to the South Song?scholar?Wang?Yinglin.?This?opinion?has?been generally?accepted?regarding?the?first?two?works.? As for Shangshu Zheng zhu, however, there has been a controversy whether it was directly linked to Hui Dong, since this book has only been noticed by very few modern scholars. Based on the evidence of his intentionally incorrect signatures, this article demonstrates that Shangshu Zheng zhu, which was compiled under the name of Wang Yinglin and collected in Shanghai Library and Notional Library of China, was exactly the same work complied by Hui Dong. The supportive evidence also comes from Hui Dong’s works and Duan Yucai’s commentaries on Hui Dong’s work. Moreover, this article demonstrates that the two versions of the book held in the Shanghai Library and Notional Library of China and another version, which was revised by Li Tiaoyuan and developed into Zhengshi Guwen Shangshu, are all of the same origin. Hui Dong’s Shangshu Zheng zhu was widely circulated among Qing scholars and Li Tiaoyuan made a great contribution to the revision and publication of the book.