龙门至潼关段是典型的游荡性河道，河道变迁经常引发两省的滩地之争。清宫档案记载了山陕两省及朝廷调解、裁判的具体过程，反映了河道演变对山陕两省以及朝廷划分边界的影响。出于保护河道等原因，朝廷清晰界定了滩地所有权，把滩地定为官田，划拨给沿河村庄后征收租谷，并非“关中模式”所说的租、赋混淆，产权观念模糊。“关中模式”强调超经济强制、权势，清宫档案显示了不同于权势的国家权力，不同于人身依附的环境依附。
Abstract
The?section?of?the?Yellow?River?from?Longmen?to?Tongguan?has?a?typical?wandering?course.?The?changes?of?the?river’s?course?often?led?to?disputes?over?the?alluvial?deposits?on?both?sides?of?the?border.?The?archives?of?the?Qing?Court?reveal?the?central?government’s?role?in?the?mediation?of?disputes?between?Shanxi?and Shaanxi?provinces?when?changes?in?course?of?the?river?affected?the?boundary?between?the?two?provinces.?For?reasons?such?as?river?protection,?the?central?government?clearly?defined?the?ownership?of?alluvium?and?designated?it?as?official?land.?The?government?allocated?the?land?to?related?villages?and?imposed?rent?and?tax?obligations.?This?was?not?the?so-called?Guanzhong?Mode?of?confused?rent?and?tax?collection?or?the?fuzzy?concept?of?property?rights.?The?Guanzhong?Mode emphasized extra-economic coercion and force. Archives of the Qing Court clearly reveal that state?power?was?different?from?coercion,?and?environmental?dependence?was?different?from personal?attachment.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
Hu?Yingze.?“Hedaobiandong?yu?jiedebiaoda-yi?qing?zhi?minguo?de?shan、 shaan?tan?an?wei?zhongxin”?(Change?of?river?course?and?definition?of?boundary:a?case?study?of?boundary?disputes?over?beach?land?between?shanxi?province?and?shaanxi?province?from?the?Qing?Dynasty?to?the?Republic?of?China).?Zhongguoshehuilishipinglun (Chinese Social History Review)?(2)?2006.
Hu Yingze. Jindai diquanyanjiude ziliao, gongju yu fangfa-zailun ‘guanzhong moshi’?(The?data， tools and methods for?researching?modern?land?ownership-a?re-discussion?of?the?Guanzhong?Mode).?Jindaishi yanjiu (Modern Chinese History Studies) (4) 2011.
Hu?Yingze.“Liudongdetudi?yu?guhuadediquan:qingchu?zhi?minguo?guanzhongdongbu?diceyanjiu”?(Flowing?land?and?consolidated?land?rights:?a?study?of?the?guanzhong?eastern?catalogue?from?the?early?Qing?Dynasty?to?the?Republic?of?China).Jindaishi yanjiu (Modern Chinese History Studies) (3) 2008.
Hu?Yingze.?“Liudong?de?tu?di:?mingqing?yilai?huanghe?xiaobeiganliuquyu?shehui?yanjiu”?(Flowing?land:?a?study?on?the?regional?society?of?the?xiaoiaobei?mainstream?of?the?Yellow?River?Since?Ming?and?Qing?Dynasty).?Beijing:?Beijing?daxue?chubanshe,?2012.
Liu?Bingtao.“Huanjingbianqian?yu?cunmin?yingdui:?jiyu?mingqing?huanghexiaobeiganliu?xi?an?diqu?de?yanjiu”?(Environmental?changes?and?villagers’?response:?the?study?of?the?west?region?of?the?north?Yellow?River?in?Ming?and?Qing?Dynasties). Zhongguo nongshi (Agricultural History of China) (4) 2008.
Liu?Heyu.“Qingdai?‘jixintan’zheng?an?de?huanjingshi”?(The?locals?or?strangers:the?environmental?history?of?the?JiXinTan’s?dispute?in?the?Qing?Dynasty).?Shizhi xuekan (Journal of History and Chorography) (3) 2018.
Mu?Jun.“Qingdai?tumoteqiyudalateqide‘tandiqijie’jiufenshimo”?(The?beginning?and?end?of?the?disputes?on?the“Boundary?of?the?beach?flag”between?Tumote?Banner?and?Dalate?Banner?in?Qing?Dynasty).?Lishidili (Historical Geography) (1) 2015.
Qin Hui,Jin Yan. Tianyuanshi yu kuangxiangqu-guanzhongmoshi yu qianjindai shehui de zai renshi (Pastorals and rhapsodies:a research for peasant societies and peasant culture). Beijing:?Yuwenchubanshe,?2010.
Xu?Jianping.“Minguo?shiqi?e?wan?gan?sansheng?yanjiangbianjie?tiaozheng?yu?jiangdi?weihu”?(The?boundary?adjustment?and?the?enbarkment?maintenance?among?Hubei,?Anhui?and?Jiangxi?in?the?Republic?of?China).?Shilin (Historical Review)?(4)?2009.
Zhao Haixiang, Huanghe xiaobeiganliu shanxi hewuju. Shanxi huanghe xiaobeiganliu zhi (The?xiao?bei?main?stream?of?the?Yellow?River?in?Shan?xi).?Zhengzhou:?Huanghe?shuili?chubanshe,?2002.
PDF(1302 KB)
