主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2004, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 19-25.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

阮元调和汉宋学思想析论 

  

  1. 北京师范大学历史学系
  • 出版日期:2004-11-15 发布日期:2004-11-15

An Analysis of Ruan Yuan’s Reconciliation of the Han and Song Schools of Thought

  • Online:2004-11-15 Published:2004-11-15

摘要: 阮元生当乾嘉汉学风靡之时 ,深受汉学皖派由训诂以明义理之学风的影响 ,为学扬汉抑宋 ,主张“实事求是” ,学以致用。然而作为当时学术界“山斗” ,以科举正途入仕的阮元又不满于汉学家的门户之见 ,主张调和汉宋之争。这是因为 ,一方面 ,清廷奉程朱理学为官方正统哲学 ;另一方面 ,汉学末流日益脱离现实而不能解决任何实际问题。他主张兼采汉宋学的思想 ,对晚清学术界特别是以林伯桐、陈澧等为代表的岭南学术产生了深远的影响。

Abstract: Ruan Yuan ( 1764-1849) was a very famous scholar-bureaucrat during the reigns of Qianlong, Jiaqing and Daoguang in the Qing Dynasty He was deeply affected by the school of Han Learning in Anhui which originated from Dai Zhen ( 1723-1777) Ruan agreed with the scholastic method of finding the Y i-Li from phonetics and etymology Furthermore, he stood for the Han Learning and restrained the Song Learning in his works .Ruan advocated seeking truth from facts and the goal of applying scholarship to statecraft , but, as the Mount Taishan and the North Star of the academic circles of his time, Ruan Yuan w as not satisfied with the sectarian bias of the Han learners He worked hard to reconcile the debate between the Han and the Song schools of thought, because the Song learning served as the official philosophy and the Han Learning increasingly lost contact with reality. Ruan Yuan’s effort to reconcile the debate exerted a great influence on the academic circles of the Late Qing Dynasty, especially the Ling-Nan school which was lead by Lin Botong ( 1775-1845) and Chen L i ( 1810-1882).