主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2007, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 63-69.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

清史研究现状中的若干问题与解决方法

  

  1. 中国人民大学清史研究所
  • 出版日期:2007-11-15 发布日期:2007-11-15

Questions and Solutions in Studies of Qing Dynasty

  • Online:2007-11-15 Published:2007-11-15

摘要: 历史研究的基本问题无外乎两样。一是史料,一是史观,抑或研究方法。目前,国内学者津津乐道于研究方法一如西方学者热衷于创建研究方法。然而,历史的客观叙述终究基于丰厚真实的史料,合理完美的理论是历史研究的工具而非目的。无论如何,挖掘、甄别史料应是每个历史研究者的首要任务。西方学者按照其注重逻辑的传统往往痴迷于研究方法论的构建,多以为历史研究不仅在于叙述过去的历史,还应对未来做出预想。若此,中国传统的编年体式的历史叙述,在他们的眼中自然显得平铺刻板而缺乏科学性。然而,如果我们将历史界定为"过去的状态",那么,我们对史料乃至历史真实的追求实应凌驾于研究方法的创建之上。

Abstract: Two basic keys to history study can be listed as history document and history viewpoint, or research method. Nowadays, just like the western scholars focusing on developing research method, our domestic historians have the same enthusiasm in research method. However, any theory, no matter how perfect it is, could only be seen as a tool for history study. An objective conclusion is fundamentally based on true and abundant history documents. Therefore, it is an initial task for historians to explore and select history documents. Western historians pay much more attention to the built-up of methodology due to philosophic. Their understandings of history study are not only the presentment of history, but also forecast for the future, which answers for the reason why they feel that the Chinese traditional historic records in chronological style are boring and lack of scientific values. Whereas, as we define history as a state of past time, we have to put more stress on pursuit of documents and truth in history, other than built-up of methodology.