礼仪与权威认知：乾隆帝画像与瞻礼、金瓶掣签制度的改革

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

乾隆年间，清廷曾分别向达赖喇嘛的布达拉宫、班禅额尔德尼的扎什伦布寺赠送了两幅描绘乾隆帝身着佛装、扮演文殊菩萨形象的画像。但在不同的语言文献中，关于这两幅画像于何时、因何事由被送到西藏的问题，竟然出现了完全迥异的记载。本文根据与画像有关的满文档案和藏语文献，梳理乾隆帝画像入藏的经过以及画像与瞻礼、金瓶掣签制度改革的关系，进而分析清廷试图透过画像所传达的政治话语以及藏传佛教世界的成员如何感知、回应皇帝的权威。

关键词: 乾隆帝, 文殊菩萨, 金瓶掣签, 瞻礼, 藏传佛教

Abstract:

The Qing Court had presented two portraits, depicting Emperor Qianlong dressed as Bodhisattva Manjusri, to the Potala Palace of the Dalai Lama and the Tashi Lhunpo Monastery of Panchen Erdeni during the reign of Qianlong. However, in different linguistic historical materials, there are many different accounts on the issues of when and why these two portraits were sent to Tibet. Based on relevant Manchu and Tibetan documents, this paper will analyze the process of the portrait's entry into Tibet, and the relationship between Qianlong’s portraits and the reform of zhanli and the Golden Urn Lottery System, to show the political discourse conveyed by these portraits and how the Tibetan Buddhists perceived and responded to the Emperor's authority.

Key words: Emperor Qianlong, Bodhisattva Manjusri, Golden Urn Lottery System, zhanli, Tibetan Buddhism

惠男. 礼仪与权威认知：乾隆帝画像与瞻礼、金瓶掣签制度的改革[J]. 清史研究.

HUI Nan. Rituals and Authority: Qianlong's Portraits and the Reform of “zhanli” and the Golden Urn Lottery System[J]. Studies in Qing History.

参考文献

Berger, Patricia. Empire of Emptiness: Buddhist Art and Political Authority in Qing China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2003. Chen Qingying. “Qingdai Jinping Cheqian zhidu de zhiding jiqi zai Xizang de shishi” (The Qing Dynasty’s Golden Urn Lottery System: its implementation in Tibet). Xizang Minzu Xueyuan Xuebao (Journal of Tibet Nationalities Institute) 3 (2006). Crossley, Pamely K. A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. Farquhar, David M. “Emperor as Bodhisattva in the Governance of the Ch’ing Empire”. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 38, 1 (1978), pp. 5-34. Kahn, Harold L. “Diwang pinwei: Qianlong chao de hongwei qixiang yu yiguo qizhen” (Imperial Taste: The Monumental and Exotic in the Qianlong Reign). Qingshi yanjiu (The Qing History Journal) 3 (1992). Luo Wenhua. Longpao yu jiasha: qinggong zangchuanfojiao wenhua kaocha (Dragon Robe and Cassock: An investigation of Tibetan Buddhist culture in Qing dynasty). Beijing: Zijincheng chubanshe, 2005. Luo Wenhua. Kanbujian de tangka yishu (Mysterous Thangka From Tibet). Beijing: Wuzhouchuanbo chubanshe, 2016. Murakami, Nobuaki. “A Study of the‘Zhanli ( 瞻礼 )’by the Ambans in Lhasa and the Relationship between the Qing Dynasty and Tibet in the Latter Half of the 18th Century”. Journal of Asia and Africa Studie 3 (2011). Oidtmann, Max. Forging the Golden Urn: The Qing Empire and the Politics of Reincarnation in Tibet. New York:Columbia University Press, 2018. Rawski, Evelyn S. The Last Emperors: A Social History of Qing Imperial Institutions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. Wang Junzhong. “Manzhou yu wenshu de yuanyuan ji xizang zhengjiao sixiang zhong de fopusa” (The Relationship between “Manchu” and “Manjusri” and A Discussion of “Leaders” and “Bodhisattvas” in the Tibetan Politico-Religious History). “Zhongyang yanjiuyuan” jindaishisuo jikan (Bulletin of the Institute of Modern History Academia Sinica) 28(1997). Wang, Xiangyun. “The Qing Court’s Tibet Connections: Lcang skya Rolpa’irdor je and the Qianlong Emperor”. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 60, 1 (2000). Zhang Yongjiang. “Liyi yu zhengzhi: qingchao libu yu lifanyuan dui feihanzuqun de wenhua zhili” (Rites and Politics: The Cultural Governance of the Non-Han Ethnic Groups by the Board of Rites in the Qing Dynasty). Qingshi yanjiu (The Qing History Journal) 2 (2019). Zito, Angela. Shenti yu bi (Of Body and Brush). Translated by Li Jin. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 2014.

[1]	安海燕. 作为“转轮王”和“文殊菩萨”的清帝——兼论乾隆帝与藏传佛教的关系[J]. 清史研究, 2020, 0(2): 105-118.
[2]	祁美琴；安子昂. 试论藏传佛教的王朝化与国家认同—以清朝敕建藏传佛寺为中心的考察[J]. journal6, 2019, 0(1): 1-16.
[3]	杜家骥. 乾隆之生母及乾隆帝的汉人血统问题[J]. journal6, 2016, 0(2): 45-56.
[4]	郭文忠. 清朝与哈萨克汗国首次通使若干问题再探讨[J]. journal6, 2016, 0(1): 28-38.