清初的奏事体制与政务运作

清史研究

清初的奏事体制与政务运作

马子木

南开大学历史学院

出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-03-15
作者简介:马子木（1992 －），男，南开大学历史学院副教授，天津 300350；mazimu92@163. com

The Zoushi System and the Operation of Central Government in Early Qing

MA Zimu

School of History, Nankai University

Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-03-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

所谓奏事体制，是指康熙年间形成的以奏事官为核心的文书流转与政令传递机制。奏事官最初由侍卫群体分化产生，其后逐渐演变为以内务府包衣为主的专差，职司奏本、绿头牌以及奏折的转进、下发以及谕旨的传宣，显示出清初政务处理向内廷转移的趋势。奏事体制的产生，一方面整合了顺治年间内降谕旨的颁行渠道，突破了清初章奏进御与批答处理的固有模式，淡化中间机构，建立起君臣直接交通的政务运作模式；另一方面亦构成奏折广泛行用的制度基础，借助奏事体制，与密折迥异的京官奏折在康熙中后期成为京内衙署与皇帝沟通的重要载体。

Abstract:

The Zoushi system was a document circulating and political information communication system that took shape during Kangxi era, while Memorial Processors (zoushiguan) played a core role in it. The Memorial Processors initially originated from the group of Imperial Guard (shiwei), and gradually became a specific group that consisted of officials from the Imperial Household Department (neiwufu). Its main duty was transferring government documents such as palace memorial (zouzhe or zouben) and lütou pai, as well as issuing imperial edict, both of which showed the center of Qing’s decision-making was turning back to the inner court. The Provincial Memorial system integrated non-grand secretary-involving channels through which imperial edicts could be issued from emperor himself during Shunzhi era, as well as innovated the inherent memorial submission and decision making mode by weakening the importance of intermediary institutions and establishing a new method of government operation in which the emperor and officials could communicate directly. The Provincial Memorial system also was the institutional foundation of the widely used palace memorial. This new type of governmental document became a crucial tool for the communication between emperor and institutions in Beijing during the mid and late Kangxi era.

马子木. 清初的奏事体制与政务运作[J]. 清史研究.

MA Zimu. The Zoushi System and the Operation of Central Government in Early Qing[J]. Studies in Qing History.

参考文献

Du Jiaji. “Mingqing liangdai gongting zhi chayi chutan” (On the Differences of the Courts in Ming and Qing Dynasties). Beijing shehui kexue (Social Sciences of Beijing) 5 (2013). Gao Xiang. “Qingchao neige zhidu shulun” (Studies on the Grand Secretary in the Qing Dynasty). Qingshi luncong (Collected essays on Qing history). Beijing: Zhongguo guangbo dianshi chubanshe, 2005. Guo Chengkang. Shiba shiji de zhongguo yu shijie: zhengzhi juan (China and the World in the Eighteenth Century: Political History). Shenyang: Liaohai chubanshe, 1999. Peterson, Willard ed. The Cambridge History of China, vol. 9, part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Qi Meiqin. Qingdai neiwufu (The Imperial Household Department in the Qing Dynasy). Beijing: Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe, 1998. Qi Meiqin. “Cong qingdai neiting xingzou kan chaochen de jinshihua qingxiang” (The Tendency of the Courtiers to Become the Palace Attendants: The Title “Concurrently Serving in the Inner Court” in the Qing Dynasty). Qingshi yanjiu(The Qing History Journal) 2 (2016). Ren Qing. “Qingchu zouzhe tanxi” (Studies on the Palace Memorial in Early Qing). Qingshi yanjiu (The Qing History Journal) 3 (1996). Wang meijue and Ma Weixi. “Qingdai zoushichu xukao” (Restudy on Chancery of Memorials of the Qing Dynasty). Shixue yuekan (Journal of Historical Science) 7 (2019). Wang Sizhi. “Qingchengmingzhi shuoneige” (Studies on the Grand Secretary: from the Perspective of Ming-Qing Institutional Continuity). Qingshi luncong (Collected essays on Qing history). Beijing: Zhongguo guangbo dianshi chubanshe, 2000. Yang Qiqiao. Yongzhengdi jiqi mizhe zhidu yanjiu: zengdingben (Emperor Yongzheng and the Secret Memorial: Revised Edition). Changsha: Yuelu shushe, 2014. Yao Nianci. Qingchu zhengzhishi tanwei (Studies on the Political History of Early Qing). Shenyang: Liaoning minzu chubanshe, 2008. Zhuang Jifa. Qingdai zouzhe zhidu (The Palace Memorial in the Qing Dynasty). Taipei: Gugong bowuyuan, 1979.