主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2013, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 86-94.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

论清代秋审“签商”

  

  1. 吉林大学法学院
  • 出版日期:2013-02-15 发布日期:2013-02-15
  • 作者简介:张田田(1986—),女,吉林大学法学院2011级博士研究生; 长春 130012

Attached Argument in the Form of Qian in Autumn Joint Retrial in the Qing Dynasty

  • Online:2013-02-15 Published:2013-02-15

摘要: “签商”从清代公牍中看,指多个办事机构间提出异见、进行交流的书面讨论形式,在中央司法环节中可能出现的有三法司 “签商”、九卿 “签商”、秋审 “签商”等。秋审 “签商”意味着秋审班中的各官员根据招册所报送的案情,在决定死囚的 “立决”或 “监候”等行刑方式时,如产生不一致看法,则可将异见先行提出,于秋审机构内部讨论; 其后果或是 “签商”者与刑部等达成一致并 “画一具奏”,或是 “签商”者保留异见并 “两议具奏”。秋审 “签商”本质是以秋审招册所载案情为基础、参与秋审的官员因具体情理与律例适用方面的斟酌权衡所产生的争议,其争议以确定犯人的 “情实”、“缓决”处理为中心,其定论关系到待决犯人的生死,是复核死刑监候案件的最终环节。相比其他会审形式,秋审 “签商”有独特之处,以此可透视秋审的制度特色与清代中央司法的运作。

Abstract: In the Qing official documents,attached argument,or“Qianshang”( Argument in the form of“Qian”) ,means attached documents with which different offices exchange their opinions officially. The “Qianshang”studied here is about the judgments of severe criminal cases reviewed in the Autumn Joint Retrial. The purpose of the Autumn Joint Retrial is designed to review the reported death penalty cases by a committee of officials authorized by the Throne.Officials of this committee could either agree with the decision of Criminal Law Department on whether the criminal should be executed immediately after the Retrial or should get a reprieve,and jointly made a memoir to the Emperor, or,disagreed with the Department and made their arguments to persuade the others in the form of “Qian”,and then report their disputes to the Emperor. The final decision of the life and death of the criminals is the pivot of attached argument in the Autumn Joint Retrial,very often providing detailed review of the case and an important perspective to study the Retrial and other respects of the central juridical system of the Qing.