主管：教育部
主办：中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊
清史研究

journal6 ›› 2014, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 102-110.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

 庚子赔款筹议方式比较研究

  

  1. 中国社会科学院近代史研究所
  • 出版日期:2014-05-15 发布日期:2014-05-15
  • 作者简介:侯中军(1977—)，男，中国社会科学院近代史研究所副研究员，北京 100006; houzhj@ cass．org．cn
  • 基金资助:

    2011 年度国家社会科学基金青年项目 ( 11CZS040) 。

A Comparative Perspective on the Payment Policy of the Boxer Indemnity

  1. Institute of Modern History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
  • Online:2014-05-15 Published:2014-05-15
  • About author:Hou Zhongjun ( Institute of Modern History，Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; houzhj@ cass． org．cn)

PDF

摘要： 甲午战后，清政府被迫举债归还日本所勒索的战争赔款。列强通过争夺贷款权，掀起了在华瓜分势力范围的高潮。然而，取得如此重大利益的各国在议论庚子赔款偿付方式时，最终采取了抵押分期偿还的方式。抵押分期偿还的方式，对清政府而言，是一个两害相权取其轻的选择。列强能同意中国分期偿还，不意味着其否定甲午战后的政治贷款，而只是一种为了帮助清政府维持统治，从而实现其利益最大化的行为。

Abstract: Defeated by Japan in 1894，the Qing government was forced to borrow money to pay Japan an
indemnity． The great powers fought for the chance to make the loans and set off the division of China into
spheres of influence． When negotiating the way to pay the Boxer indemnity，the great powers did not
force China to borrow money again they accepted mortgage installments． From the point of view of the
mortgage payments was a way of maintaining the rule of Qing government，and not defaulting on the loan
of 1894． The only aim of the great powers was to maximize their own interests in China．