主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 10-20.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

清末新政前后旗人与宗室官员的官职变化初探——以《缙绅录》数据库为材料的分析

  

  1. 香港科技大学人文社会科学学院社会科学部
  • 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2018-12-05
  • 作者简介:陈必佳(1991—),女,香港科技大学人文社会科学学院社会科学部博士候选人,bchenag@ust.hk;康文林(1967—),男,香港科技大学人文社会科学学院社会科学部教授,华中师范大学历史文化学院长江学者讲座教授,camcam@ust.hk;李中清(1952—),男,香港科技大学人文社会科学学院讲座教授,jqljzl@ust.hk

The Transition of Banner and Imperial Lineage Officials During the Late Qing Reform Period:Evidence from the Qing Jinshenlu Database

  1. School of Humanities and Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  • Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-12-05
  • About author:CHEN Bijia(School of Humanities and Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; bchenag@connect.ust.hk). Cameron Campbell (School of Humanities and Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; School of History and Culture, Central China Normal University; camcam@ust.hk) James Lee (School of Humanities and Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, jqljzl@ust.hk)

摘要: 清末十余年间,清政府迫于内政外交的压力和应对统治危机,在教育、军事和行政机构等方面开展了一系列推动现代化的改革。既有的相关研究中,对于这一时期制度改革随之带来的人事变化关注甚少,结合人事变动来理解新政这一议题更是被学界忽视。本文尝试利用缙绅录量化数据库,对新政期间京师各机构改革中的人事变化进行分析,并以度支部衙门为例重点关注包括宗室人员在内的旗人官员的比例和变化,以冀对分析和认识这一特殊时期的中央行政状况提供新的视角。

Abstract: This article uses the Qing Jinshenlu Database to track the career transitions of Banner officials during the late Qing reform period. The institution reform pushed forward by the Qing government in 1906 was their first attempt of modernization. In the existing literature, however, the personnel transition and changes during the reform was understudied. This study tries to apply quantitative method using longitudinal micro-level data to analyze the career changes during the transition period, with a focus on the discussion of the conqueror Manchu officials. We also took the Ministry of Revenue as an example to illustrate the career mobilities of banner officials. By providing the analyzing results, we hope to shed light on the tension between Manchu and Han officials, and also provide a new perspective for the study of late Qing reform in the central government.