近代西方人西藏研究的国家竞争与学术流变

清史研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 130-142.

近代西方人西藏研究的国家竞争与学术流变

崔华杰（1983 －），男，山东大学历史文化学院副教授，济南 250100；huajiecui@sdu. edu. cn

山东大学历史文化学院

出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-05-25
作者简介:崔华杰（1983 －），男，山东大学历史文化学院副教授，济南 250100；huajiecui@sdu. edu. cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学项目青年基金“近代来华基督教传教士与中史西传研究”（14CZS041）；山东大学历史学科高峰计划项目（10000086393104）。

International Competition and the Academic Evolution of Modern Western Studies of Tibet

CUI Huajie (School of History and Culture, Shandong University; huajiecui@sdu. edu. cn)

School of History and Culture, Shandong University

Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-05-25
About author:CUI Huajie (School of History and Culture, Shandong University; huajiecui@sdu. edu. cn)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 受殖民利益驱使，西方人在近代深入西藏地区开展各类调查工作，间接开启了对西藏的文化研究活动。经游历家、传教士等个体和皇家地理学会等专业组织的努力，英国逐渐将西藏研究从地理情报搜寻转向为学术综合考察。俄国出于地缘政治利益需要，在西藏研究上与英国形成学术竞争，在此期间西方人的成果呈现史学化的特点。美国站在地方、国家和洲际的观察视角，最终将西方人西藏研究由地理游记纳入区域研究的学术体系。

关键词: 西藏研究, 大角逐, 英国皇家地理学会, 海外汉学

Abstract: Driven by colonial interests, Westerners went deep into Tibet to carry out various surveys in modern times and indirectly started cultural research activities in Tibet. With the efforts of travelers, missionaries, and other individuals, as well as professional organizations such as the Royal Geographical Society, Britain gradually changed the study of Tibet from a geographical information search to a comprehensive academic investigation. For the sake of geopolitical interests, Russia engaged in academic competition with Britain in Tibetan studies, and Western studies made historic contributions. From the perspective of local, national, and international observations, the United States eventually extended Western Tibetan studies from the geographical travel sketch to the academic system of regional studies.

崔华杰. 近代西方人西藏研究的国家竞争与学术流变[J]. 清史研究, 2021, 0(3): 130-142.

CUI Huajie . International Competition and the Academic Evolution of Modern Western Studies of Tibet[J]. Studies in Qing History, 2021, 0(3): 130-142.

参考文献

Cable, Mildred. The Challenge of Central Asia: A Brief survey of Tibet and its Borderlands, Mongolia, North-West Kansu, Chinese Turkistan, and Russian Central Asia, London: World Dominion Press, 1929. Feng Zheng. Guowai Xizang yanjiu gaikuang (A survey of Tibetan studies abroad). Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1979. Hedin, Sven. Central Asia and Tibet: Towards the Holy City of Lassa, London: Hurst and Blackett, 1903. Li Xuan. “Meiguo zangxue de lishi, xianzhuang he weilai” (The history, current situation and future of Tibetan studies in the United States). Xibei minzu yanjiu (North west ethno-national studies) (2) 2016. Liang Junyan. Yingguo yu Zhongguo Xizang, 1774-1904 (Britain and Tibet of China,1774-1904). Lanzhou: Lanzhou daxue chubanshe, 2012. Liu Shengqi. Liu Shengqi zangxue wenji (Liu Shengqi’s collection of Tibetan studies). Beijing: Zhongguo zangxue chubanshe, 2008. Su Faxiang. “Yingguo zangxue yanjiu gaishu” (An overview of Tibetan studies in Britain). Zhongguo zangxue (China Tibetology) (3) 2018. Taylor, Bayard. Central Asia: Travels in Cashmere, Little Tibet and Central Asia, New York: Charles Sribner’s Sons, 1885. Wang Yuanda. Jindai Eguo yu Zhongguo Xizang (Modern Russia and Tibet of China). Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 1993. Wu Guanghe and Tang Shaoqing. “Lun pu er re wa ji zai yazhou zhongbu dili yanjiu zhong de diwei he zuoyong” (On the position and role of Prjeválsky in the geographical study of central Asia). Lanzhou daxue xuebao (Journal of Lanzhou University) (1) 1986. Wu Kunming. Zaoqi Chuanjiaoshi jin zang huodong shi (History of early missionaries’ activities in Tibet). Beijing: Zhongguo zangxue chubanshe, 1992. Xirao nima. Xizang bainian shi yanjiu (A study on the centennial history of Tibet). Beijing: Sheke wenxian chubanshe, 2015.