主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2009, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 56-71.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

“南掌即老挝”谬说考

  

  1. 北京大学历史学系
  • 出版日期:2009-11-15 发布日期:2009-11-15

"Nanzhang" as another Name of Laos:A Mistaken View

  • Online:2009-11-15 Published:2009-11-15

摘要: 南掌是清代的朝贡国。《大清会典》等史料称"南掌即老挝",此说常被作为通说接受。然而,明代的老挝在明清之际已经一分为三,其中的琅勃拉邦王国于雍正时向中国进贡;所谓南掌系指琅勃拉邦。"南掌即老挝"的谬见的产生和沿承,与朝贡体制下清政府获取南掌信息的方式与特点相关。晚清时,人们增进了对南掌的了解,发现南掌已被暹罗吞并,但"南掌即老挝"的通说地位却一直未获动摇,延续至今。

Abstract: “Nanzhang” was one of Qing Dynasty’s tributary states. It is widely assumed that “Nanzhang” was another name of Laos. The Da Qing Huidian and many other historical sources support this view. However, Laos, which had been a united kingdom in the Ming Dynasty, divided into three parts in the late seventeenth century and early eighteenth century. The northern territory of Laos became a new kingdom, Luang Prabang, which was known as “Nanzhang” in Chinese records. Thus, the view that “Nanzhang” was another name of Laos is mistaken. The provenance and general acceptance of this view is related to some features of information gathering under the tributary system. In the late Qing, people had a better understanding of “Nanzhang”. In fact, many people knew that Siam had annexed “Nanzhang”. Despite this, most people still held the erroneous view that “Nanzhang” was another name for Laos.