主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

清史研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 17-30.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

时间与刑罚:清代永远监禁考略

姜翰
  

  1. 中国人民大学法学院
  • 出版日期:2019-11-15 发布日期:2019-11-15
  • 作者简介:姜翰(1990 -),男,中国人民大学法学院博士研究生,北京 100872;jianghan2017@ruc.edu.cn

Period and Penalty: “Perpetual Imprisonment” in the Qing Dynasty

JIANG Han   

  1. School of Law, Renmin University of China
  • Online:2019-11-15 Published:2019-11-15

摘要: 学界将清代永远监禁作为秋审、朝审的特殊结果,但缺乏深入探讨,文本与实践的考察表明永远监禁主要创制于乾隆时期,嘉庆、道光时期达到适用高峰,直至清末。随着时间的推移,实践当中呈现出制度型永远监禁与权宜型“永远监禁”并行的状态,而“永远监禁”以其自身的灵活性、惩罚性、层级性也发挥了其他手段难以企及的重要作用,尤其表现在皇恩宣示、情法两平、疑案处理与预防犯罪方面,反映出“永远监禁”的刑罚本质。

Abstract: Previous researchers have considered“perpetual imprisonment” in the Qing dynasty a eculiar result of the autumn assizes and court assizes, but this phenomenon has not received the full attention it has deserved. An examination of textual evidence and a survey of the practice reveals that it appeared first in the ianlong Period and reached its peak in the Jiaqing and Daoguang Periods. Over time there were two types of perpetual imprisonment. There was institutional and expedient perpetual imprisonment. Due to its flexible, punitive and hierarchical characteristics, perpetual imprisonment played a role that was unlike any other means of punishment. The practice of perpetual imprisonment was an example of the imperial commitment to balancing circumstances and law in doubtful cases, and crime prevention that reflected perpetual imprisonment’s penal nature.