主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2014, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 34-44.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

 清代外官大计 “考语” 与 “事实” 探析

  

  1. 北京市社会科学院满学研究所
  • 出版日期:2014-05-15 发布日期:2014-05-15
  • 作者简介:常越男(1979—),女,北京市社会科学院满学研究所副研究员,北京 100101; changynpku@126.com

Commentary and Reality of Officials Assessment in the Qing Dynasty

  1. Institute of Manchuology,Beijing Academy of Social Science
  • Online:2014-05-15 Published:2014-05-15
  • About author:Chang Yuenan ( Institute of Manchuology,Beijing Academy of Social Science; changynpku@126.com)

摘要: 清代大计 “考语”,是督抚对属官考核的综合评语,亦为考察官员政绩的主要依据。 “考语”分为卓异官、平等官、应去官三类,具有概括性,而相关 “事实”则为官员细化的日常行政表现。清前中期政府重视大计 “考语”,为此多次进行调整,其注写方式渐趋简化,“八字考语”成为惯例。官员实政则体现于上官出具的 “事实”。“考语”的固定模式,对清代后期地方官年终密考、州县事实考核等规制皆产生较大影响。在清代的不同发展时期,大计官员的 “考语”、“事实”的格式和内容都有变化,从侧面折射出地方吏治的清浊。

Abstract: The Great Reckoning was a regular evaluation of civil officials provinces in the provinces that was
held every three years in the Qing Dynasty. Officials would be classified into three grades according to the
assessment: officials who were recommended as outstanding and distinctive; those who were listed neither
for recommendation nor impeachment; and those who were charged with eight proscriptions. The
governor-general assessed the officials and then gave his comments. The actual achievements were also
required. After the government of the Qing Dynasty modified the assessment system,the comments
became more concise,usually in eight words. Such fixed format of the comments also influenced the
remarks of other assessment systems in the late Qing Dynasty,such as the year-end assessment and the
evaluation methods of the magistrates. As to the comments and the actual achievements of the officials,
their formats and content varied in different stages of the Qing Dynasty,which can be regarded as an index to the corruption of the bureaucracy.