主管:教育部
主办:中国人民大学
ISSN 1002-8587  CN 11-2765/K
国家社科基金资助期刊

journal6 ›› 2014, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 74-88.

• 学术专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

1868年前后汉字汉文在日本之状况

  

  1. 中国人民大学清史研究所
  • 出版日期:2014-11-15 发布日期:2014-11-15
  • 作者简介:曹雯(1968—),女,中国人民大学清史研究所副教授,北京 100872; caowen330@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社会科学研究重大项目清代中西中日文化关系史研究: 以语言的交流互动为中心(08JJD770090) 经费资助。

The Status of Chinese Characters and Written Chinese in Japan circa 1868

  1. Institute of Qing History,Renmin University of China
  • Online:2014-11-15 Published:2014-11-15
  • About author:CAO Wen ( The Institute of Qing history,Renmin University of China; caowen330@sina.com)

摘要: 19世纪中叶,最初由欧洲发起并逐渐向欧洲以外地域推广的现代化运动开始波及东亚。与中国不同,在经历了最初的徘徊之后,日本转而坚定走上欧洲现代化历程。这一努力方向使得日本很快便面临如下问题:用怎样的语言对民众实施教育。而近代日本语言的改良首先面对的便是如何对待自己语言中的汉文抑或汉文字这一问题。于此,民间舆论开始分化:是全部废除汉文字,还是对汉文字的数量进行适当删减。通过本文的观察可知,在近代教育尚未完全展开的19世纪60年代末,主张以假名文字或洋文字为国字的激进改良者的提案并不能得到政府抑或民间的回应,即便如福泽渝吉般的温和改良者所提出的倡议也不能有效激起社会的反响。日本文字的改良尚有待于具有初步近代西方意识的知识者的成批涌现,他们将成为推动社会改革的基础力量。

Abstract: By the mid- nineteenth century the modernization movement that began in European gradually had spread to East Asia. Unlike China,after some initial wavering,Japan steadfastly followed the European path of modernization. Putting all its effort in this direction,Japan quickly faced the following issue:What language should be used to educate the people? Therewasalso the question of how the modernization Japanese would treat Chinese characters and the Japanese kana syllabary.Public opinion was divided between those who wanted to abandon Chinese characters completely and those who thought amount of Chinese used could be appropriately reduce.Based on the author s observations,when the modernization of education had yet to be launched in the 1860s,the reformers who advocated the radical reform of kana syllabary and Western languages as national language were unable to obtain the support of the government or the people,and even moderate reformers like Fukazawa Yukichi who supported reform could not obtain support for Japanese society.Japanese intellectuals had yet to advocate language reform as part of initial Westernizing reform,and instead they advocated the power of basic social reforms.